Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Support OTEL for native C/C++ #899

Open
mekhanique opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request: Support OTEL for native C/C++ #899

mekhanique opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
area: api area: core area: integration enhancement New feature or request Platform: Native SDK parity Behavior that other SDKs provide and we are missing or implement differently

Comments

@mekhanique
Copy link

You've recently announced OTEL support for multiple different languages. However, C/C++ (and other native toolchains) are not listed as "coming". Native has the least functionality for instrumentation and profiling. Adding OTEL support will greatly improve the feature set. Please consider supporting this, even if implemented one language at a time.

@getsantry getsantry bot moved this to Waiting for: Product Owner in GitHub Issues with 👀 Nov 2, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Discussion in Mobile & Cross Platform SDK Nov 2, 2023
@getsantry getsantry bot removed the status in GitHub Issues with 👀 Nov 3, 2023
@supervacuus supervacuus added the SDK parity Behavior that other SDKs provide and we are missing or implement differently label Nov 3, 2023
@ashwoods ashwoods moved this from Needs Discussion to Backlog in Mobile & Cross Platform SDK Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: api area: core area: integration enhancement New feature or request Platform: Native SDK parity Behavior that other SDKs provide and we are missing or implement differently
Projects
Status: No status
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants