You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Over time methods of /geonetwork/doc/api/ will be migrated to dedicated microservices. Some methods may actually move from /geonetwork/doc/api/ to /ogcapi, even if they are not mandated by the standard, but are more logical in that context, for example the list-domain (codelist/thesauri) methods.
Methods related to harvesting management and user/group management are probably the first to be migrated to a dedicated micro service.
So we'll have a landscape of microservices, each having their open-api-document. The UI (or documentation) is probably a good place to contain a list of all open-api-documents in a typical geonetwork setup.
A question I have is if we shouldn't create individual projects for ogcapi, harvest-microservice, user/group management?
We will have part of the API exposed by GN4 (https://apps.titellus.net/geonetwork/doc/api/) and part of the API in microservices. How do we combined the 2? Is it needed?
Currently we are using swagger to build the openapi doc.
OGC API Records (https://github.com/geonetwork/geonetwork-microservices/tree/main/modules/services/ogc-api-records) will also provide an openapi doc that we are using to build the server code
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: