You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So this is a great program. But what I would love is a reverse socks tunnel feature. So that you could have a client connect to a server and bind a local port on the server to listen and tunnel into the client's network. This is great if you have a client that doesnt have a public IP but you need to be able to reach into it's network. This is equivalent to ssh's -R option:
Currently, wssocks indeed does not support reverse proxy directly.
But wssocks+ssh can be a workaround.
Consider you have a web service on the client (at port :9050), and server has a public IP (e.g. pub.server.com).
In traditional approach, if client can connect to server via ssh directly, we can use ssh -R, just like:
So this is a great program. But what I would love is a reverse socks tunnel feature. So that you could have a client connect to a server and bind a local port on the server to listen and tunnel into the client's network. This is great if you have a client that doesnt have a public IP but you need to be able to reach into it's network. This is equivalent to ssh's
-R
option:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: