Get feedback on current new go_refs page

[kltm]

As the new page assembly gets put together, we want to make sure that it is acceptable to users.

[kltm]

Will need @pgaudet feedback.

[pkalita-lbl]

Some screenshots from my development branch that can be reviewed

Top of page

Linked to a specific GO REF (somewhere in the middle of the page)

End of page

UPDATE: You might notice in the screenshots that plain URLs in the descriptions are not linked. I fixed that after making the screenshots!

[kltm]

Talked to @pgaudet. @pgaudet will reach out to some other users and see what they prefer.

[kltm]

@pgaudet also floated ToC pager, and then linking to individual pages.

[pgaudet]

Decision: individual pages + ToC page

[kltm]

Also, there needs to be a link tot SoT (somewhere), so users that want to search through everything can do so. @pgaudet , can you define whether to do this on each page, or just on the ToC.
As well, can you define what you want to see on the ToC? I'm assuming just titles?

[pgaudet]

The source of truth (SoT) yaml file is an internal documentation, I propose to put a link in the wiki under the Annotation group documentation. OK ?

[pgaudet]

• Added a link to the goref.yaml file in the Annotation documentation: https://wiki.geneontology.org/Annotation_guidelines#General_Annotation_Documentation
  @vanaukenk can you please add this to the list of discussion topics for the next annotation call ?

[kltm]

@pgaudet @vanaukenk Noting that this is not yet the SoT and will not be until Patrick's go-ref project is completed. He will do a final sync to re-match things before switching over, but be aware that the old SOP is in place until that happens.

[pkalita-lbl]

Here's a prototype of a basic ToC page:

And an individual GO REF page:

The "All GO REFs" on the individual GO REF page links back to the ToC page. Let me know if you'd like the ToC page linked from anywhere else, e.g. the header menu. Any other feedback is certainly welcome.

[kltm]

Looks good to me. @pgaudet, do you have any feedback here?

[pgaudet]

Looks good.

I have one feature request : to have OBSOLETE refs in a separate section at the bottom.

But if that's complicated we can drop it. Not a requirement for this work.

Thanks, Pascale

[pkalita-lbl]

No that's not complicated at all, will do.

[pgaudet]

This seems to be all done? Can this ticket be closed?

[pkalita-lbl]

Yes I'd say so