You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that the pattern generator is choosing the max of perimeter_acceleration, infill_acceleration, solid_infill_acceleration, top_solid_infill_acceleration, and external_perimeter_acceleration for the test acceleration value.
I'm using a Prusa MK4 with a 0.4mm nozzle. When using the default 0.2mm STRUCTURAL print profile, the external_perimeter_acceleration is 1500mm/s² and the infill_acceleration is 4000mm/s². The difference between these two values is fairly large.
Wouldn't it be more ideal for the test to use the value for external_perimeter_acceleration since those are the most visible part of a print? Or perhaps an average of some subset of the acceleration values?
I may have some misunderstanding regarding this particular tuning process, but up to this point I've always used my external_perimeter_acceleration value for generating test patterns with the Marlin LA calibration tool or Ellis' PA/LA tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see that the pattern generator is choosing the max of
perimeter_acceleration
,infill_acceleration
,solid_infill_acceleration
,top_solid_infill_acceleration
, andexternal_perimeter_acceleration
for the test acceleration value.I'm using a Prusa MK4 with a 0.4mm nozzle. When using the default 0.2mm STRUCTURAL print profile, the
external_perimeter_acceleration
is 1500mm/s² and theinfill_acceleration
is 4000mm/s². The difference between these two values is fairly large.Wouldn't it be more ideal for the test to use the value for
external_perimeter_acceleration
since those are the most visible part of a print? Or perhaps an average of some subset of the acceleration values?I may have some misunderstanding regarding this particular tuning process, but up to this point I've always used my
external_perimeter_acceleration
value for generating test patterns with the Marlin LA calibration tool or Ellis' PA/LA tool.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: