Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use external perimeter acceleration for test acceleration #18

Open
npburns224 opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Use external perimeter acceleration for test acceleration #18

npburns224 opened this issue May 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@npburns224
Copy link

npburns224 commented May 22, 2024

I see that the pattern generator is choosing the max of perimeter_acceleration, infill_acceleration, solid_infill_acceleration, top_solid_infill_acceleration, and external_perimeter_acceleration for the test acceleration value.

I'm using a Prusa MK4 with a 0.4mm nozzle. When using the default 0.2mm STRUCTURAL print profile, the external_perimeter_acceleration is 1500mm/s² and the infill_acceleration is 4000mm/s². The difference between these two values is fairly large.

Wouldn't it be more ideal for the test to use the value for external_perimeter_acceleration since those are the most visible part of a print? Or perhaps an average of some subset of the acceleration values?

I may have some misunderstanding regarding this particular tuning process, but up to this point I've always used my external_perimeter_acceleration value for generating test patterns with the Marlin LA calibration tool or Ellis' PA/LA tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant