Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions about embedshim reliability based on sanbox API #38

Open
silence-coding opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Questions about embedshim reliability based on sanbox API #38

silence-coding opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@silence-coding
Copy link

I have a question. In the shimv2 scenario, if a shim process is used to manage all containers, even if the shim process takes over the original container through ebpf after abnormal restart, all containers will be stopped because containrd invokes the stop command of shim. In the sanbox API scenario, if embedshim is an independent process and exits abnormally, will containrd forcibly delete (restart) the container managed by embedshim?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant