Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Core fields query issue in WP V6.4.4 and higher [URGENT] #60

Closed
dChiamp opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Core fields query issue in WP V6.4.4 and higher [URGENT] #60

dChiamp opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dChiamp
Copy link
Contributor

dChiamp commented Apr 16, 2024

These core fields for the following blocks are broken in wordpress Versions 6.4.4 and higher:

  • field text on type CoreButtonBlockAttributes
  • field content on type CoreListItemBlockAttributes
  • field citation on type CoreQuoteBlockAttributes
  • field content on type CoreParagraphBlockAttributes
  • field content on type CoreHeadingBlockAttributes
  • field caption on type CoreGalleryBlockAttributes
  • field caption on type CoreEmbedBlockAttributes
  • field caption on type CoreImageBlockAttributes
  • field content on type CoreParagraphBlockAttributes

I've updated fuxt-backend to WordpPress version 6.5.2 to reproduce the error there so you can easily test.
That causes the same error as v6.4.4.

Flywheel is auto updating a lot of our sites from WP v6.4.3 to v6.4.4 so this issue is having a big impact.

We've tried updating all plugins, adding the newest fuxt-backend theme, and updating to latest WP version without success.

Here's a screenshot of the error:
gql-err

@drewbaker
Copy link
Member

drewbaker commented Apr 16, 2024

Seems to be related with the move from 6.4.3 to 6.4.4.

Something that changed here: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/59828

PR was here: WordPress/gutenberg#43204

@drewbaker
Copy link
Member

@drewbaker
Copy link
Member

Temp solution is to just limit wordpress to version 6.4.3 until this is solved.

@austinblanchard
Copy link

fixed with #61

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants