Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FRESH vs JSON RESUME #16

Closed
drkarl opened this issue Mar 9, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

FRESH vs JSON RESUME #16

drkarl opened this issue Mar 9, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@drkarl
Copy link

drkarl commented Mar 9, 2016

I really like HackMyResume (well, I'm a little bit confused of wether I should use HackMyResume or the fork FluentCV, and if I wanted to contribute to which project should I contribute).

I think FRESH is a good format, but I also think JSON Resume is a good format, and there seems to be more people involved on the latter, and seems to have more adoption and more momentum. So, my question (and is a honest question), why don't we just use one format? That would allow to focus efforts and move faster.

There are probably good reasons to maintain FRESH separate/different from JSON Resume, I'd like to know about them :)

@drkarl
Copy link
Author

drkarl commented Mar 9, 2016

I think this answers my question :)

fresh-standard/fresh-themes#45 (comment)

Translations between the disparate formats are a lot easier if you have a universal container format that won't lose data. That format is FRESH.

@drkarl
Copy link
Author

drkarl commented Mar 9, 2016

Also, about fresh-standard/fresh-themes#45 (comment)

I agree with you, I want to use this concept of decoupling the data and appeareance of a CV locally, not in a cloud service where I wouldn't have control of my data.

@drkarl
Copy link
Author

drkarl commented Mar 9, 2016

I'll close this now :)

@drkarl drkarl closed this as completed Mar 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant