You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 6, 2021. It is now read-only.
It would be helpful to ban spambots without affect some legit unidentified users.
Spambots usually are not registered and don't use gateways, so we can ban all unidentified users that not use a gateway. If we call that new extban $e, so +b $e:*!*@gateway/* would ban ever unidentified user that not fit *!*@gateway/*.
And it can be also used when we want to ban unregistered users but we know some IP range or domain that is safe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it is also a good idea an extban to unidentified users that does match a usermask, to set some wide ban to unidentified as alternative to ban all unidentified. If we call that extban $u, +b $u:*!~*@* would ban unidentified users that don't use Ident.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
It would be helpful to ban spambots without affect some legit unidentified users.
Spambots usually are not registered and don't use gateways, so we can ban all unidentified users that not use a gateway. If we call that new extban $e, so
+b $e:*!*@gateway/*
would ban ever unidentified user that not fit*!*@gateway/*
.And it can be also used when we want to ban unregistered users but we know some IP range or domain that is safe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: