You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For each submission or reply, we should track the GPG key used to encrypt this submission or reply.
This will provide the base for server-side key management, allowing for better handling of rotation use-cases and providing functionality required for future support of submission/per journalist keys(as described in #2841)
There are several ways this can be implemented, the key fingerprint as a field in Submissions or Reply table, or creating a new table and a foreign key reference to that key (fingerprint, and other useful metadata, such as time of validity of the key).
How should we handle existing submissions and replies? Ideally we would want all (including all past) submissions and replies to have metadata about the associated key, but it might be impractical to implement a migration around this for historical submissions and replies.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
emkll
changed the title
Store GPG key used to encrypt submission and replies
Store reference to GPG key used to encrypt submission and replies in database
Apr 14, 2020
Description
For each submission or reply, we should track the GPG key used to encrypt this submission or reply.
This will provide the base for server-side key management, allowing for better handling of rotation use-cases and providing functionality required for future support of submission/per journalist keys(as described in #2841)
There are several ways this can be implemented, the key fingerprint as a field in Submissions or Reply table, or creating a new table and a foreign key reference to that key (fingerprint, and other useful metadata, such as time of validity of the key).
How should we handle existing submissions and replies? Ideally we would want all (including all past) submissions and replies to have metadata about the associated key, but it might be impractical to implement a migration around this for historical submissions and replies.
Ref: freedomofpress/securedrop-client#140
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: