Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add URL/API to add new Feeds #254

Closed
jan-battenfeld opened this issue Apr 14, 2013 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1310
Closed

Add URL/API to add new Feeds #254

jan-battenfeld opened this issue Apr 14, 2013 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1310

Comments

@jan-battenfeld
Copy link
Contributor

If I want to add a new source i have to
copy address -> open selfoss -> goto Sources -> add new -> select rss-handler -> paste the link -> type in title or go back and copy again -> fill in tags -> save

Would be nice to point new feeds to something like http://your.selfoss.com/?addFeed=%s which would fill in Name and Url of %s into the AddSource Page.

Many Browser/Addons show an customizable Add Feed-icon in the titlebar and simply send the feed-url to an api which would reduce the above to
click rss symbol -> (click abo) -> fill in tags -> save

Possible enhancements/problems:

  • autodetect source (like twitter or tumblr), otherwise default to rss-feed
  • on the fly mode: add NEW label and save without further interaction for rss handler without redirect.
@bsweeney
Copy link

Love this idea. Kind of like the "easy add" bookmarklet provided by Google Reader. Makes adding new feeds a snap.

@wccrawford
Copy link

I was just looking to see if there was a bookmarklet for adding feeds to Selfoss. Hopefully, once there's an API, someone will make a fancy one that detects feeds on the page, etc.

@funwhilelost
Copy link

👍

@jtojnar jtojnar added the ui label Feb 5, 2017
@funwhilelost
Copy link

Any progress on this one? I just bumped up to 2.17 and don't see any mention of it yet.

@jtojnar
Copy link
Member

jtojnar commented May 5, 2017

@niol added client-side URL handling in #869, so it should be easier to implement it now. However, it is not on my to-do list for 2.18, so unless someone sends a pull request it will have to wait.

@funwhilelost
Copy link

Awesome. That work looks great on #869. I'll wait until that drops and then take a look at making a PR based on that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants