-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New force:source:push
command JSON output has changed completely and is missing critical information, e.g., error messages/line/column info
#1431
Comments
Thank you for filing this issue. We appreciate your feedback and will review the issue as soon as possible. Remember, however, that GitHub isn't a mechanism for receiving support under any agreement or SLA. If you require immediate assistance, contact Salesforce Customer Support. |
force:source:push
command JSON output has changed completelyforce:source:push
command JSON output has changed completely and is missing critical information, e.g., error messages/line/column info
Additionally the |
@SCWells72 - thanks for posting this. We're working on a fix now. |
A standard I also ran with
|
CLI version 7.141.1 has been published as a release candidate and contains the rollback. The legacy commands continue to be aliased such that (e.g. for source status): UPDATE: CLI version 7.141.1 has now been promoted to production. |
@shetzel I've verified that 7.141.1 resolves the issues while retaining the behavior of the |
With the promotion of the beta commands to GA, the JSON-based tooling integration API has been changed completely. For example, the previous command reported a failure as:
while the new command reports the same failure as:
Not only has the structure of the JSON changed completely, but there's no useful error information in the JSON output, e.g.,
columnNumber
,lineNumber
, orerror
information.Unless I'm missing something, it looks like these commands should be rolled back to beta until they provide parity information via the JSON-based programmatic interface, no?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: