We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, is_strong_typedef is an implementation detail in type_safe::type_safe_op::detail:
is_strong_typedef
type_safe::type_safe_op::detail
type_safe/include/type_safe/strong_typedef.hpp
Line 207 in 2809f17
For me and my SFINAE approach it would be of help to have is_strong_typedef (and a is_strong_typedef_v) in the (public) type_safe namespace.
is_strong_typedef_v
type_safe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sure, can you do a PR?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Sure :) I'm going to need some time, though.
merged
No branches or pull requests
Currently,
is_strong_typedef
is an implementation detail intype_safe::type_safe_op::detail
:type_safe/include/type_safe/strong_typedef.hpp
Line 207 in 2809f17
For me and my SFINAE approach it would be of help to have
is_strong_typedef
(and ais_strong_typedef_v
) in the (public)type_safe
namespace.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: