Ruby version requirement change in 6.0.0?

[mjankowski]

Just saw the 6.0.0 release -- nice, thanks!

Curious about this ruby version req change - e54203b#diff-53ec28e04e87eace119c08cf1afa508aa03532493a9e256ed8ddcd2fd0c72423R15 - I think ruby 3.0 was recently EOL'd but ruby 3.1 is still supported for another ~year or so ... https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/downloads/branches/

Was there a rubocop requirement or other ruby style thing somewhere in the recent changes that merited bumping all the way up to 3.2 minimum, or could 3.1 have been kept? Would like to bump the browser gem dep, but still have some legacy 3.1 installs to support.

(I originally left this as a comment on a commit, but realized that may not be super visible. Sorry about the effective double posting...)

[johan-smits]

I also ran into this issue. I'm using Debian stable and they are at Ruby 3.1. Dropping the 3.1 seems a little to soon?