Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support S3-compatible providers (non-AWS) #383

Closed
mstenta opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Support S3-compatible providers (non-AWS) #383

mstenta opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@mstenta
Copy link

mstenta commented Aug 5, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

AWS is where S3 started, but other providers offer S3-compatible object storage as well. Examples:

It seems that this plugin would work with non-AWS providers, but this statement in the docs leads to uncertainty:

s3_endpoint

endpoint for S3 compatible services. For example, Riak CS based storage or something. This option is deprecated for AWS S3, use s3_region instead.

https://github.com/fluent/fluent-plugin-s3/blob/master/docs/output.md#s3_endpoint

Describe the solution you'd like

Clarify whether or not non-AWS providers are supported by this plugin, or if that support will be removed in the future.

If the s3_endpoint is not going to be removed, then it should not be described as "deprecated" in the documentation.

Describe alternatives you've considered

None.

Additional context

No response

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 30 days

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 4, 2021
@repeatedly
Copy link
Member

repeatedly commented Nov 4, 2021

We don't have a plan to remove s3_endpoint option.
This option is deprecated for AWS S3, use s3_region instead. is not same as "This option is deprecated"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants