You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think that pinned screenshots should skip the taskbar, i.e not be alt-tabb'able.
The rationale is that they're always on top anyway, so one doesn't need to switch to them.
Instead, they take a slot and create extra friction for the user when they switch windows.
The window property that controls this is _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR, just like _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE control always-on-top.
This can be manipulated with xprop / wmctrl:
2022-01-29_14-41-56.mp4
What do you think?
Thanks!
Gilad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
giladbarnea
changed the title
Pinned window: can it have SKIP_TASKBAR property (non alt-tab'abble)?
Pinned window: can it skip the taskbar (be non alt-tab'abble)?
Jan 29, 2022
There are already discussions to improve the pinned tool (#2251#954) and most probably some keyboard shortcuts will be added to the pin tool. When that happens, this would actually make it hard for people who mostly use/rely on keyboard.
@giladbarnea do you know if qt has a cross platform wrapper for that API?
@borgmanJeremy No idea, but if I understand correctly, this thread suggests that child widows don't take up a slot in taskbar, and (this is where I'm not sure) you could create a faux parent window and hide it, thus ending up with one window that skips taskbar?
Feature Description
Hi,
Thanks for flameshot!
I think that pinned screenshots should skip the taskbar, i.e not be alt-tabb'able.
The rationale is that they're always on top anyway, so one doesn't need to switch to them.
Instead, they take a slot and create extra friction for the user when they switch windows.
The window property that controls this is
_NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR
, just like_NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE
control always-on-top.This can be manipulated with
xprop
/wmctrl
:2022-01-29_14-41-56.mp4
What do you think?
Thanks!
Gilad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: