🐛 [ml_vision] APK double size with 0.12.0 coming from 0.9.10

[jaumard]

Hello,

My APK was doing 39MB, after upgrading ml_vision I'm getting 66MB!!!

By checking the APK I see those new items:

When previously I had only this:

Also gaining 9MB with "models":

Is those coming from this package too??

That's a huge issue to me, having a quick fix or workaround would be appreciated.

I have checked the gradle file of the plugin and saw that:

  api "com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-vision"

        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision:20.1.1'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-common:19.1.1'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-face-contour-internal:16.0.3'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-image-labeling-internal:16.0.5'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-image-label:18.0.5'
        implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-vision-face-model:20.0.2'
        implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-model-interpreter:22.0.4'

Compare to previously:

api 'com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-vision:20.0.0'
        implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-common:16.1.0'
        implementation 'androidx.annotation:annotation:1.0.0'
        implementation 'androidx.exifinterface:exifinterface:1.0.0'

[tokyokamera]

I have same problem.Please fix it!

[jaumard]

I have deleted manually those lines and rebuild my APK:

implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-face-contour-internal:16.0.3'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-image-labeling-internal:16.0.5'
        implementation 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-vision-image-label:18.0.5'
        implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-vision-face-model:20.0.2'
        implementation 'com.google.firebase:firebase-ml-model-interpreter:22.0.4'

And my APK is back to 30MB

[markusaksli-nc]

Hi @jaumard
I see there's an open issue addressing the case you described #4767.
Please follow up on that issue, I'm closing the current one as a duplicate.
If you disagree, please write in the comments and I will reopen it.
Thank you