Proposed Updates to Core Devs Meeting Format #104
Unanswered
kaitlin-beegle
asked this question in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks @kaitlin-beegle, well-motivated changes, I look forward to trying it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
At Core Devs Meeting #44, I presented a new structure for future Core Devs meetings. The need for such change was predicated on the following:
Assumptions
Current Challenges
In order to address these challenges, I'd like to propose a new meeting structure. The idea is that with fewer, more focused meetings, and explicit attendance requirements, attendees will have a clearer sense of the purpose and importance of the meeting while delivering more productive outcomes.
In addition to the above, new meetings will be executed with a revamped list of attendees. Current Core Devs would get to review proposed attendees; guests could also join to deliver presentations, etc., but anyone labeled a 'Core Dev' will be expected to attend.
Much like the Storage Provider Working Groups, an attendance benchmark will be set. This benchmark could be a three-strike policy, etc., but can be adjusted as needed to account for attendee schedules.
The purpose of these attendance policies is not to exclude participants, but to rather set an expectation for attendance. Guest presenters, observers, and others will still be able to attend on an invite-only basis.
We have already received strong support for these changes in both Core Devs meetings #44 and #45. I look forward to gathering any additional feedback.
Any meeting changes will be put in place following the Filecoin v16 mainnet upgrade on July 6, 2022.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions