Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Community Diligence Review of QC_Data_center Allocator #124

Closed
luhong123 opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Community Diligence Review of QC_Data_center Allocator #124

luhong123 opened this issue Aug 6, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Refresh Applications received from existing Allocators for a refresh of DataCap allowance

Comments

@luhong123
Copy link

Review of Allocations from QC_Data_center
Allocator Application: filecoin-project/notary-governance#1071

All SPs support Spark

First example:
DataCap was given to:
luhong123/QC-Data-center#3

First: 512TiB
• Second:1PiB
• Third: 1PiB
• Fourth:2PiB

Due diligence was conducted before each signing. Pay close attention to Spark data, SP disclosure, etc.

SP disclosure:
f02363181 Huhehaote
f02368946 Huhehaote
f02362412 California
f02639492 California
f03166666 Hongkong
f03166668 Hongkong
f02822222 Hong Kong
f02588263 Hong Kong

Actual data storage report:
https://check.allocator.tech/report/luhong123/QC-Data-center/issues/3/1722912731582.md
image

The client actually sealed 7 SPs, and the latest 2 can already see the retrieval rate on spark
image

@Kevin-FF-USA Kevin-FF-USA self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
@Kevin-FF-USA Kevin-FF-USA added the Refresh Applications received from existing Allocators for a refresh of DataCap allowance label Aug 6, 2024
@luhong123
Copy link
Author

image
Overall retrieval rate looks good

@kevzak
Copy link
Contributor

kevzak commented Aug 12, 2024

Hi @luhong123 - we think it is important for all clients to start providing more details of data preparation. See my proposal #125 any thoughts?

@luhong123
Copy link
Author

Hi @luhong123 - we think it is important for all clients to start providing more details of data preparation. See my proposal #125 any thoughts?

Check back later.

@Kevin-FF-USA
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello!
Shifting the response and continue of this review into this issue: #140. Will close this issue (when 140 closes)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Refresh Applications received from existing Allocators for a refresh of DataCap allowance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants