PROPOSAL: change the use
command structure
#155
Replies: 4 comments
-
This would mean that there would be a tree of commands as a result, use->cluster provider->identity provider. We'd also want to functionality that maps cluster providers to allowed identity providers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If we went with this approach you wouldn't be able to set the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Without doing this we need to have the forked version of Cobra where we can dynamically inject flags. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If no So i think perhaps we stay with what we have? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Describe the solution you'd like:
Currently when you
use
you are required to specify the cluster provider as a positional argument and then the IdP protocol as a flag:Would it make more sense to also specify the identity plugin via a position argument so you end up with:
What does everyone think? Would this feel more natural?
/cc @rajarajanpsj @seankelly001 @saada
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions