You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the great work! I train the DiS-S/2 model for 200K steps using train.py and sample using unconditional DDPM for 250 time steps to generate 10K samples. Then I got the FID-10K=16.446, which is higher than the result in figure 2.
I follow the hyperparameters unchanged in train.py. For sampling, I follow the DiT Code and modify the sample_ddp.py and sample_ddp.sh which can be found in the sample_ddp.zip file. For FID computation, I pass both the reference cifar10-train folder and generated sample folder to test.py.
I wonder how to reproduce the results of unconditional CIFAR10 generation. Can you please help me with that? Really appreciate it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kongwanbianjinyu
changed the title
Unconditional Cifar10 dataset FID higher than reported in the paper.
Unconditional Cifar10 generation FID higher than reported in the paper.
May 5, 2024
Hello @feizc ,
Thanks for the great work! I train the DiS-S/2 model for 200K steps using train.py and sample using unconditional DDPM for 250 time steps to generate 10K samples. Then I got the FID-10K=16.446, which is higher than the result in figure 2.
I follow the hyperparameters unchanged in train.py. For sampling, I follow the DiT Code and modify the sample_ddp.py and sample_ddp.sh which can be found in the sample_ddp.zip file. For FID computation, I pass both the reference cifar10-train folder and generated sample folder to test.py.
I wonder how to reproduce the results of unconditional CIFAR10 generation. Can you please help me with that? Really appreciate it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: