-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
triple check we are off data warehouse #2102
Comments
found a VW_FILING_HISTORY that needs to be removed |
@LindsayYoung so does this table mean that any entry with "new table name" is blank are tables that need to be removed? |
If it is blank, those have been moved to another table, not the same version of that table. If it says "not used" we are good because there is not a reference to that table in our codebase. |
Hmm ok. But I'm having trouble understanding. What remaining changes do we need to do to completely get off the warehouse / for this issue to be closed ? |
For completion of this issue, just look at the last row and "not used" or "x" are done Task wise, we need to get off of I think we are off sched_a, sched_b and sched_e but I need to check them. It just takes longer to check because when you look at the code we have things that use those names and you need to look at each time it comes up in the code to make sure it is a code reference and not a table reference. |
also found a fec_vsum_f76 straggler |
Warehouse tables
blank entries signify there is not direct replacement
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: