You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What we're after:
One of the interpretive rules (on electronic contributor redesignations) got modified by the new technological modernization rules. OGC would like us to note that on the policy page and the guidance search.
Specifically, they want us to add this language from footnote 47 of the rulemaking: To the extent that this interpretive rule’s
approach to a ‘‘signature’’ could be construed to conflict with the new definition of ‘‘signature,’’ it is superseded.
This needs to be added to the Policy page in this part:
and to this FR notice when it appears as a search result in the Guidance search:
I've worked with Jim Jones to make the replacement PDF and updated the page. Am running the changes by OGC to make sure they're happy before I update guidance search.
Summary
What we're after:
One of the interpretive rules (on electronic contributor redesignations) got modified by the new technological modernization rules. OGC would like us to note that on the policy page and the guidance search.
Specifically, they want us to add this language from footnote 47 of the rulemaking: To the extent that this interpretive rule’s
approach to a ‘‘signature’’ could be construed to conflict with the new definition of ‘‘signature,’’ it is superseded.
This needs to be added to the Policy page in this part:
and to this FR notice when it appears as a search result in the Guidance search:
They'd also like us to link to the FR notice with the new rules for electronic redesignations: https://sers.fec.gov/fosers/showpdf.htm?docid=424497
(For @prstoetzer - these changes might be needed on any H4CC pages you are drafting with the rulemaking updates as well.)
Related issues
Completion criteria
Tech steps or considerations
We need to create a new PDF for the interpretive rule with a text box explaining to check the new rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: