Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Save code used for E&J tables into either GitHub or Google drive #5316

Closed
2 tasks done
Tracked by #159
dorothyyeager opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done
Tracked by #159

Comments

@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor

dorothyyeager commented Jun 27, 2022

Summary

What we are after:
As a legal researcher, I need to review explanations and justifications for regulations.

The content team updates the E&Js whenever a new regulation is released. This is a tedious process involving much manual html coding and many html tables. The manual tables were our first iteration just to get the migration of those tables done. (For an example, take a look at the tables on https://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/regulations/explanations-and-justifications/citation-index-part-109/#part-109-subpart-b-independent-expenditures. There are many more like this and many of them are more dense.)

The coding for the tables is saved in an Information Division folder; this is a website team project though, so the coding should really be stored in GitHub or Google drive.

Completion criteria

  • Best place to store the coded tables is determined (discuss with @patphongs and @rfultz who came up with this prototype)
  • Code is uploaded to that place.
@dorothyyeager
Copy link
Contributor Author

The codes have been uploaded into the "E&J Codes" folder within the content folder. In addition, URLS that pointed to http:/sers.fec.gov were updated to https://sers.fec.gov and URLs that pointed to transition files were updated to the current location.

Next step: A thorough inventory in #5373

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants