Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recording receipts guide page consistency #3866

Open
4 tasks
Tracked by #138
bmathesonFEC opened this issue Jun 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks
Tracked by #138

Recording receipts guide page consistency #3866

bmathesonFEC opened this issue Jun 25, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@bmathesonFEC
Copy link
Contributor

bmathesonFEC commented Jun 25, 2020

Summary

While converting the recording receipts guide pages from custom to resource templates I observed several instances of inconsistency between the pages for each committee type. As a result, two steps should be taken to improve the pages:

  1. Content from one guide that is applicable to other committee types should be added to those guides. For example:

    • Recording Party receipts has information about identifying contributors when the contribution is made by text message and online banking services, but that content is not available in the candidate page or either PAC page (There are no AOs for text messages for SSFs).
  2. Content that is in multiple guides but has non-exact language across those pages should be made consistent. For example:

    • all of the guides have a section about illegal contributions, but they are not consistent when possible. (Candidate, Party, PAC, SSF)

The differences in the headings and subheadings on each page is documented here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LAfe4ko1bXdUQ2RO4MiNEOtHHnPMctq6PpiOxlu91d8/edit?usp=sharing

Related issues

#3767 RAD FAQ: New new site content (stage 2)
#3849 Move the Best Efforts section off of Recording Receipts onto it's own page.

Completion criteria

  • Compare to newly approved candidate
  • Draft pages have new content / consistent language where possible
  • Content team review
  • Publish updates to the pages
@patphongs
Copy link
Member

Moving to 14.6 as there will be discussions about consistency in the guides

@kathycarothers
Copy link
Contributor

We will revisit this ticket once the candidate guide has been approved for the most current and approved language.

@kathycarothers kathycarothers removed this from the Sprint 15.1 milestone Apr 29, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ❄️ Icebox
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants