Implement ADR canonical page

[patphongs]

What we're after: Using the design created below and data moved to the API in 7.2, we want to begin to implement the front-end
canonical pages for ADR pages.

We're basing this first iteration on the MUR pages currently implemented in production. See example linked above.

Updated mockup following conversations during design sync and dev pairing.

Completion criteria:

• Make the ADR cannonical page.
• Send to ADR for review.
  • Ask about penalties that show as $0 vs penalty that shows as just blank
  • Ask about whether or not blank in the disposition penalty and citation columns are ok
  • Ask about whether or not blank is ok for Subject, Complainant, and Election Cycle within the summary section
• Add feature flag for ADR cannonical page.

[JonellaCulmer]

Per your comments, @patphongs, I made some adjustments to the mock-up. Please see below. Happy to discuss further in design sync.

[patphongs]

Per our design sync conversation, noting some of the updates here:

• Subject and Complainant and Election Cycles fields can be empty. For content review purposes, will leave one field as "none" and the other blank
• Remove trailing semicolon from election cycle listing
• Disposition table: Data for penalty and citation columns are not always present. Decided to leave this blank until we hear back from SMEs
• Added "Disposition" from commission votes to summary section
• Remove Legal citations section as this was decided that we did not need it since it's noted already under Disposition