Research and Design: Committee filings Raw Vs. Processed

[patphongs]

What we're after:
As a journalist, I need to be able to find the most up-to-date newly filed reports.

Background:
Currently the reports are split into 2 categories: raw vs processed. We have received feedback that users are not able to get to newly filed reports because they don't know to click on raw data.

Completion criteria:

• Research the business logic and rules for Raw vs Processed data
• Find previous design/UX research that went into the Raw vs Processed filings
• Schedule meeting to discuss the business logic and rules
• Have a meeting to discuss the business logic and rules
• Content: Review "Raw" language for possible improvements
• Design mock-ups based on discussions of business logic and rules meeting

[JonellaCulmer]

We held our meeting to go over the business logic a bit, as well as discuss what we're hoping to achieve for this ticket and we came away with the following:

• Front-end design solution. So that people will understand there’s something else that they may be interested in.
  • How does the proposed solution impact the election pages?
  • How does the proposed solution impact the candidate/committee profile pages?
• Possible next step following design update - Content review
  • What do folks need to know in addition to what’s already provided that makes it more clear what data is included in RAW filings?

[llienfec]

For an alternative to raw, content team would suggest unprocessed. We know that @JonellaCulmer is going to do a bunch of research on this. Content was wondering if it's the word raw that's tripping up users, if they're missing the select data type section... or some another issue altogether.

[JonellaCulmer]

Research I don't want to lose:
Design improved raw efiling data interface based on usability testing: fecgov/openFEC-web-app#1716
Raw vs processed filters inventory: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16DWIquTYpbdtCCDrXYLXXRrHQXS51sX_8cLY75spLA0/edit#heading=h.eorwi166f0rw
Notes on source reports: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_yTs019sscgqle3p-G56kf8p4YeCKQnUGlV03zG59rs/edit
BetaFEC sprint 2 goals (talks about processed vs. raw): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15Cv8IVOF2vuY_hf7QXGtT80fRonKh3ZGpmuF1Ipoev4/edit#heading=h.31s5b2qr32fu
Old test script: https://github.com/fecgov/FEC/blob/master/research/test_scripts/2016-08-18.md

[JonellaCulmer]

This issue is being pushed back to a future sprint to allow for testing time.

Testing ticket: fecgov/fec-testing#116