-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test line chart data due 9/20 #2334
Comments
The functionality of the line and data points looks great. The cursor moves much more predictably and if you put your cursor on a month, the totals include data for that month. Looks really good! Checking the data is a little more complicated and needs a team-swarming approach:
|
API fixes explained here: fecgov/openFEC#3251 and fecgov/openFEC#3240 |
Let's create some feature flags for the charts. That way if there's a problem we can easily flip the flag to remove the charts until things are fixed. |
Created feature flags for the charts, we can flip them on/off now without needing a hotfix |
@PaulClark2 sent the data to test so I'll be splitting it up among team members. I'm having trouble easily moving between election cycles - I think I may be missing something obvious (apologies if so!). The interaction to move between election cycles take a really long time. You have to press the arrows for each data point on the graph to get to the previous cycle. I think that in the past, the arrows moved users between cycles. If there's any way that we can change the arrow action to move between cycles instead of months, that would be really helpful. |
@llienfec This has actually always been the interaction of the arrows. That's certainly something to take a look at as a usability issue for the chart @JonellaCulmer? cc @PaulClark2 |
@patphongs That's correct. @llienfec The timeframe has always been from the start of the cycle through that month. The toggle is used as a way for those with accessibility concerns to arrow through if they are unable to use their mouse to move between time periods. However, the inability to move more quickly between cycles is something to consider when we take a closer look at the helpfulness of this chart and see what kind of feedback we can from the reaction box and user testing. The primary purpose of this reimplementation was just to be put back into production what we currently have built - with some slight modifications. Some questions I'd like answered include:
In addition to:
|
Make sense, thanks for taking a look. Also, we need to re-run the data because of discrepancies. We'll try again before splitting up the testing. |
Line chart testing instructionsAssignments:
Goal:We’re checking that the data is right on the line charts. We’re hoping to finish this by Monday (9/24) close of business. Let me know if you can't or have problems. Directions:Compare the data in the link with your name (it’s a google sheet) to the data in these line charts:
People testing SPENDING:
Be sure to change the chart's time period so that it matches what you're testing. Findings:
|
Testing resultsProblems:2018 raising
2018 spending
Other findingsData matches for election cycles 2016 and before. |
^^ @PaulClark2 I need some help figuring out why the 2018 data doesn't match the line charts. Thanks! |
@hcaofec @jwchumley Can you work with @PaulClark2 to investigate where the data is diverging for 2018 Raising and Spending data? Check the query please. |
The line chart will be hidden under the |
@jwchumley please add your findings about the data discrepancies - Thanks! |
The testing has been completed and the line chart data issue was moved to this ticket: #2449. Closing this issue. |
The line charts for Raising and spending will be re-implemented into 3 places on the site (see list below). Testing for this should be completed by 9/20 and this feature will be released to prod on 9/25:
Things to test:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: