Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PyTorch: merge layer with a constant input #1082

Open
4 tasks done
sei-jgwohlbier opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
4 tasks done

PyTorch: merge layer with a constant input #1082

sei-jgwohlbier opened this issue Oct 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@sei-jgwohlbier
Copy link

Prerequisites

Please make sure to check off these prerequisites before submitting a bug report.

  • Test that the bug appears on the current version of the master branch. Make sure to include the commit hash of the commit you checked out.
  • Check that the issue hasn't already been reported, by checking the currently open issues.
  • If there are steps to reproduce the problem, make sure to write them down below.
  • If relevant, please include the hls4ml project files, which were created directly before and/or after the bug.

Quick summary

Merge layers that have a constant input do not work with PyTorch.

Details

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Clone the hls4ml repository
  2. Checkout the master branch, with commit hash: [afed23b]
  3. Run this test code.
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import os
import shutil
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torchinfo import summary

from hls4ml.converters import convert_from_pytorch_model
from hls4ml.utils.config import config_from_pytorch_model

test_root_path = Path(__file__).parent

if __name__ == "__main__":

    class test(nn.Module):
        def __init__(self):
            super().__init__()

            self.downsample = nn.AvgPool1d(kernel_size=1, stride=2)

        def forward(self, x):
            d = self.downsample(x)
            p = torch.mul(d,4.3)
            return torch.cat((d, p), dim=-1)

    n_in = 2
    size_in = 8
    n_batch = 2

    model = test()
    io_type='io_stream'
    backend='Vitis'
    output_dir = str(test_root_path / f'hls4mlprj_mul_{backend}_{io_type}')
    if os.path.exists(output_dir):
        print("delete project dir")
        shutil.rmtree(output_dir)

    model.eval()
    summary(model, input_size=(n_batch, n_in, size_in))

    X_input = np.random.rand(n_batch, n_in, size_in)
    with torch.no_grad():
        pytorch_prediction = model(torch.Tensor(X_input)).detach().numpy()

    # X_input is channels last
    X_input_hls = np.ascontiguousarray(X_input.transpose(0, 2, 1))

    # write tb data
    ipf = "./tb_input_features.dat"
    if os.path.isfile(ipf):
        os.remove(ipf)
    np.savetxt(ipf, X_input_hls.flatten(), newline=" ")
    opf = "./tb_output_predictions.dat"
    if os.path.isfile(opf):
        os.remove(opf)
    with open(opf, "ab") as f:
        for p in pytorch_prediction:
            np.savetxt(f, p.flatten(), newline=" ")

    config = config_from_pytorch_model(model,
                                       (None, n_in, size_in),
                                       backend=backend,
                                       default_precision='ap_fixed<16,6>',
                                       channels_last_conversion='internal',
                                       transpose_outputs=False)
    config['Model']['Strategy'] = 'Resource'
    print(config)
    print(output_dir)

    hls_model = convert_from_pytorch_model(
        model,
        output_dir=output_dir,
        input_data_tb=ipf,
        output_data_tb=opf,
        backend=backend,
        hls_config=config,
        io_type=io_type,
        part='xcvu9p-flga2104-2-e'
    )
    hls_model.compile()

    print("pytorch_prediction")
    print(pytorch_prediction)
    print("pytorch_prediction.shape: ", end=" ")
    print(pytorch_prediction.shape)

    # reshape hls prediction to channels last, then transpose, then reshape
    # to match .view
    hls_prediction = hls_model.predict(X_input_hls)
    #hls_prediction = np.transpose(
    #    np.reshape(hls_prediction,
    #               (n_batch, int(size_in/2)+size_in, n_out)),
    #    (0,2,1)
    #)

    print("hls_prediction")
    print(hls_prediction)
    print("hls_prediction.shape: ", end=" ")
    print(hls_prediction.shape)

    rtol = 1.0e-2
    atol = 1.0e-2
    assert len(pytorch_prediction) == len(hls_prediction), "length mismatch"
    assert pytorch_prediction.shape == hls_prediction.shape, "shape mismatch"
    for p, h in zip(pytorch_prediction, hls_prediction):
        np.testing.assert_allclose(p,
                                   h,
                                   rtol=rtol, atol=atol)

    # synthesize
    hls_model.build(csim=True, synth=True, cosim=True, validation=True)

Expected behavior

Successful synthesis.

Actual behavior

==========================================================================================
Layer (type:depth-idx)                   Output Shape              Param #
==========================================================================================
test                                     [2, 2, 8]                 12
├─AvgPool1d: 1-1                         [2, 2, 4]                 --
==========================================================================================
Total params: 12
Trainable params: 12
Non-trainable params: 0
Total mult-adds (M): 0
==========================================================================================
Input size (MB): 0.00
Forward/backward pass size (MB): 0.00
Params size (MB): 0.00
Estimated Total Size (MB): 0.00
==========================================================================================
{'Model': {'Precision': 'ap_fixed<16,6>', 'ReuseFactor': 1, 'ChannelsLastConversion': 'internal', 'TransposeOutputs': False, 'Strategy': 'Resource'}, 'PytorchModel': test(
  (conv1): Conv1d(2, 2, kernel_size=(3,), stride=(1,), padding=(1,), bias=False)
  (downsample): AvgPool1d(kernel_size=(1,), stride=(2,), padding=(0,))
), 'InputShape': (None, 2, 8)}
/home/hls4ml-user/work/ewstapp_research/isolate/NETWORK/hls4mlprj_mul_Vitis_io_stream
Interpreting Model ...
Topology:
Layer name: downsample, layer type: AveragePooling1D, input shape: [[None, 2, 8]]
Layer name: mul, layer type: Merge, input shape: [[None, 2, 4]]
Layer name: cat, layer type: Concatenate, input shape: [[None, 2, 4], [None, 2, 4]]
Creating HLS model
WARNING: Changing pipeline style to "dataflow".
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/work/ewstapp_research/isolate/NETWORK/test_mul.py", line 81, in <module>
    hls_model = convert_from_pytorch_model(
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/converters/__init__.py", line 308, in convert_from_pytorch_model
    return pytorch_to_hls(config)
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/converters/pytorch_to_hls.py", line 374, in pytorch_to_hls
    hls_model = ModelGraph(config, layer_list, inputs=input_layers)
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/model/graph.py", line 387, in __init__
    self._make_graph(layer_list)
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/model/graph.py", line 416, in _make_graph
    self.graph[name] = self.make_node(kind, name, layer, inputs, outputs)
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/model/graph.py", line 503, in make_node
    node = layer_cls(self, name, attributes, inputs, outputs)
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/model/layers.py", line 117, in __init__
    self.initialize()
  File "/home/hls4ml-user/miniconda3/envs/hls4ml/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hls4ml/model/layers.py", line 950, in initialize
    assert len(self.inputs) == 2

Optional

Possible fix

I figured out that the main reason this is happening is because the constant gets embedded in the torch.fx node representing the mul. I have been working on a fix that includes looking for constants and adding input like layers for the constants. I have gotten it to the point where the constant is represented as a layer, but haven't yet been able to get the actual constant through. I have to put it down for a few days, so I thought I'd post this to see if you think I'm on the right track. My fork is here if someone wants to have a look.

@JanFSchulte
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! Thanks for testing this and working on a fix! I think your development goes into a promising direction. From a quick check of your fork, it seems to be like hsl4ml is still treating the new Constant layer like an input layer and is trying to find it's tensor at runtime. I'm not quite sure how best to fix it, but maybe @vloncar can advise.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants