Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add benchmarks for native NodeJS (LTS) server? #255

Open
2 tasks done
prescience-data opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 8 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Add benchmarks for native NodeJS (LTS) server? #255

prescience-data opened this issue Sep 20, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@prescience-data
Copy link

Prerequisites

  • I have written a descriptive issue title
  • I have searched existing issues to ensure the feature has not already been requested

🚀 Feature Proposal

I might be misreading one of the existing labels which perhaps already provides this benchmark, but it would be great to get a benchmark for the native (LTS) NodeJS node:http server class.

Motivation

This would help when justifying the use of Fastify to stakeholders when presented with the "why not native?" question where native may be a reasonable option when provided the context of a performance differential.

Currently, I find myself leaning too heavily on "because we might need additional features in the future", which feels weak from a justification perspective, without knowing how much more (or less) performance might be gained from implementing the native server instead.

Example

An example would be when planning a small, simple http or websocket server for an internal application.

It's unknown or unlikely if more advanced features might be required in the future, but refactoring to Fastify in the event this occurs would be expensive.

Although certainly not the only factor within the decision matrix, the performance differential (especially if the result is better-than-native) would be a key consideration when calculating a cost/benefit EV of the comparison.

@prescience-data
Copy link
Author

prescience-data commented Sep 20, 2022

Edit - after reading a blog regarding the Fastify benchmarks, is it correct to understand that "bare" is the native server?

source

If so, perhaps making this more explicit in the results table might be helpful for some as this wasn't immediately clear to me?

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

Yes, bare is the native http server. Would you like to make a PR to keep this clearer?

@prescience-data
Copy link
Author

Yep will do that - I think just a minimal "(Node 14.x.x)" suffix should be enough if that sounds ok?

(I assume from reading the main page, this is the version used in the current benchmark?)

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

I think that might be off too, check what versions the benchmarks are actually run. You can bring it up to v18.

@prescience-data
Copy link
Author

This is the correct entrypoint to the generator that produces the markdown yeah?
https://github.com/fastify/benchmarks/blob/master/lib/packages.js

@climba03003
Copy link
Member

climba03003 commented Sep 20, 2022

Here is the actual version running against the benchmark.

This is the correct entrypoint to the generator that produces the markdown yeah?

Yes, you can update the static version to process.version.

bare: { version: '10.13.0' },

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

Note that we should also update this to node v18

@Fdawgs
Copy link
Member

Fdawgs commented Nov 20, 2024

Maybe rename base to node:http?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants