Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add code for emulated single coil #202

Open
mmuckley opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Add code for emulated single coil #202

mmuckley opened this issue Jan 5, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mmuckley
Copy link
Contributor

mmuckley commented Jan 5, 2022

This issue would add code for simulating the single-coil data from multi-coil data described in the following paper:

Tygert M, Zbontar J. Simulating single-coil MRI from the responses of multiple coils. Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science. 2020 Nov 19;15(2):115-27.
https://msp.org/camcos/2020/15-2/p01.xhtml

@mmuckley mmuckley added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 5, 2022
@sriram-1
Copy link

Hi, am interested. Please let me know the next steps.

@mmuckley
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @sriram-1, that would be fantastic! I think the first thing would be to read the paper and understand the mathematics of how the single-coil data was simulated. Then you could create a function with a signature like

def simulate_singlecoil_from_multicoil(kspace: Tensor) -> Tensor:
    # write function here

that would return the single-coil k-space based on the paper.

Create a new folder under fastmri_examples called singlecoil_simulation and include a Jupyter notebook using your function and plot the reconstruction. Compare the reconstruction from single-coil to the reconstruction from multi-coil. The single-coil should be noisier.

Once you have all this you can open a pull request and I'll review it. Once everything looks good we can merge it into the repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants