Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New models addition along with U-Net #144

Open
Bala93 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

New models addition along with U-Net #144

Bala93 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Bala93
Copy link

Bala93 commented Jul 17, 2021

Thanks for this repository.

The repo has mainly used U-Net as the base network for MRI reconstruction. I was thinking if we could add base networks which has shown promising results like the following:

  • L. Sun, Z. Fan, Y. Huang, X. Ding, and J. Paisley, “Compressed sensing MRI using a recursive dilated network,” 32nd AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. AAAI 2018, pp. 2444–2451, 2018.
  • H. Wu, Y. Wu, L. Sun, C. Cai, Y. Huang, and X. Ding, “A deep ensemble network for compressed sensing MRI,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2018, vol. 11301 LNCS, pp. 162–171, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04167-0_15.
  • R. Souza and R. Frayne, “A Hybrid Frequency-domain/Image-domain Deep Network for Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction,” no. Dc, pp. 1–8, 2018, [Online].

I have the proper PyTorch implementations for these methods. I could raise a PR. From my experience, this repository serves as the base for all the works related to MRI reconstruction. Should we think of adding new features ? Please let me know your views.

Thank you.

@mmuckley
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @Bala93, we'd love to have more models. That being said, the repository is focused around the fastMRI dataset, so we should probably focus on models that either

  1. Push top metrics on the fastMRI dataset. They don't have to be SotA but they should be in the range of the baseline models.
  2. Introduce new and interesting perspectives using the dataset.

Do you know of downstream papers that used these models on fastMRI? I looked at the Sun and Souza papers and it looked like neither one was focused on fastMRI. I wasn't able to read the Wu paper, but it doesn't seem extremely well-cited.

A couple of good papers fitting the above criteria might be

  • Eo, Taejoon, et al. "KIKI‐net: cross‐domain convolutional neural networks for reconstructing undersampled magnetic resonance images." Magnetic resonance in medicine 80.5 (2018): 2188-2201.
    • Basis for several top models submitted to fastMRI competitions.
  • Yu, Songhyun, Bumjun Park, and Jechang Jeong. "Deep iterative down-up cnn for image denoising." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 2019.
    • Not actually used on fastMRI but it's been a building block for competition models.

I'm sure there are others out there.

@mmuckley mmuckley added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants