Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 30, 2019. It is now read-only.

CIFAR-10, ResNet 110 score too low? (~5.9%) #177

Open
FredericGodin opened this issue Apr 19, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

CIFAR-10, ResNet 110 score too low? (~5.9%) #177

FredericGodin opened this issue Apr 19, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@FredericGodin
Copy link

FredericGodin commented Apr 19, 2017

I'm trying to reproduce the results for ResNet-110 on CIFAR 10.

I changed the lr schedule to the following to mimick the warm-up epoch:
if epoch == 1 then decay = 1 else decay = epoch >= 122 and 2 or epoch >= 81 and 1 or 0 end

However, now my scores are too low...
I used the following command:
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0,1 th main.lua -dataset cifar10 -nGPU 2 -batchSize 128 -depth 110 -netType resnet

I did 2 runs:
run 1: best top1=6.04, final top1=6.04
run 2: best top1=5.77, final top1=5.89

The blog post reports top1 scores of ~6.7%

Any ideas?

@Juicechen95
Copy link

maybe it is not the accuracy, it is the error.......accuracy = 100 - error

@JaeDukSeo
Copy link

Yeah it seems like an error rate

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants