-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug with double updates in a single batch #6650
Conversation
this.updateComponent( | ||
transaction, | ||
this._currentElement, | ||
this._currentElement, | ||
this._context, | ||
this._context | ||
); | ||
} else { | ||
this._updateBatchNumber = null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line seems to imply that enqueueUpdate
is getting called on a component that does not need to be updated (meets neither of the two conditions above) - which seems bad/wrong. What am I missing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. :( setState calls enqueueSetState and enqueueCallback which each create a separate batch. That is almost certainly unintended but I left it as-is for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is, enqueueCallback marks the component dirty which is harmless when done in conjunction with enqueueSetState but kinda silly when it can get split into a separate batch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Looks good to me. Let's ship it. 👍 |
👍 |
Fixes facebook#2410. Fixes facebook#6371. Fixes facebook#6538. I also manually tested the codepen in facebook#3762 and verified it now works.
@spicyj updated the pull request. |
As discussed in person: If componentWillUnmount is allowed to have side-effects (which I think it needs to because unsubscribing is a side-effect) which includes setState on another component, then it should be outside of the reconciliation pass which is supposed to be side-effect free. Maybe we should queue/defer unmounts? |
Going to bump this to 15.x since it doesn't apply cleanly without some of the things we're taking there. Shouldn't matter too much in terms of timing. |
The code here feels a little convoluted but I don't know how to make it clearer. Suggestions welcome.
cc @facebook/react-core
Fixes #2410. Fixes #6371. Fixes #6538.
I also manually tested the codepen in #3762 and verified it now works.