Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lazily freeze in case anything in the currently initializing chunk is blocked #29139

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 17, 2024

Conversation

sebmarkbage
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed #29129.

@sebmarkbage sebmarkbage requested a review from gnoff May 17, 2024 17:07
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
react-compiler-playground ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 17, 2024 5:27pm

@react-sizebot
Copy link

react-sizebot commented May 17, 2024

Comparing: 3f1436c...9304ef9

Critical size changes

Includes critical production bundles, as well as any change greater than 2%:

Name +/- Base Current +/- gzip Base gzip Current gzip
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js = 6.66 kB 6.66 kB = 1.82 kB 1.82 kB
oss-stable/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js = 495.01 kB 495.01 kB = 88.68 kB 88.68 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.production.js = 6.67 kB 6.67 kB = 1.83 kB 1.83 kB
oss-experimental/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-client.production.js = 499.81 kB 499.81 kB = 89.36 kB 89.36 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.classic.js = 592.16 kB 592.16 kB = 104.15 kB 104.15 kB
facebook-www/ReactDOM-prod.modern.js = 568.39 kB 568.39 kB = 100.55 kB 100.55 kB
test_utils/ReactAllWarnings.js Deleted 64.26 kB 0.00 kB Deleted 16.02 kB 0.00 kB

Significant size changes

Includes any change greater than 0.2%:

Expand to show
Name +/- Base Current +/- gzip Base gzip Current gzip
test_utils/ReactAllWarnings.js Deleted 64.26 kB 0.00 kB Deleted 16.02 kB 0.00 kB

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 9304ef9

initializingChunkBlockedModel.deps > 0
) {
const freeze = Object.freeze.bind(Object, element.props);
initializingChunk.then(freeze, freeze);
Copy link
Contributor

@lubieowoce lubieowoce May 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Q: is there a possibility that this callback would run before a createModelResolver callback, in which case we'd still try to mutate a frozen object? or is the inside-out traversal order of the JSON reviver protecting us from that

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sebmarkbage sebmarkbage May 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This waits until the entire chunk that was being parsed is resolved which means that everything inside it has to be initialized already. Otherwise other user spaces listeners could observer the intermediate state.

However, this does mean that an early listener to this chunk can observe it before we freeze it. Which is actually quite likely since initialization happens lazily in the first place. If that listener is the typical case of React listening then it's just a ping to schedule a rerender and the rerender happens after. You could listen yourself but this is an edge case that you need to wait for the blocked model in the first place and it's dev only and you might end up hitting the freeze later if you do something similar anyway.

Object.freeze(element.props);
if (
initializingChunkBlockedModel !== null &&
initializingChunkBlockedModel.deps > 0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since a cycle doesn't increase this dependency I'm not sure if a cycle that is in the props object itself would fail here. Maybe I'll just remove the deps check.

@sebmarkbage sebmarkbage merged commit af3a55e into facebook:main May 17, 2024
40 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants