-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fizz] Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs #26768
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
E.g. if we suspend (throw a promise) in pushStartInstance today we might have already pushed some chunks (or even child segments potentially). We should revert back to where we were. There was a todo about this already but I'm not 100% sure it's always safe. We might not even want "throwing a promise" in this mechanism to be supported longer term but for now that's how a suspend in internals.
facebook-github-bot
added
CLA Signed
React Core Team
Opened by a member of the React Core Team
labels
May 3, 2023
sebmarkbage
changed the title
Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs
[Fizz] Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs
May 3, 2023
gnoff
approved these changes
May 3, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't realize this was possible. What scenario would lead to suspend during pushStart...?
nm I see where this is going :)
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2023
E.g. if we suspend (throw a promise) in pushStartInstance today we might have already pushed some chunks (or even child segments potentially). We should revert back to where we were. This doesn't usually happen because when we suspend in a component it doesn't write anything itself, it'll always defer to som host instance to do the writing. There was a todo about this already but I'm not 100% sure it's always safe when suspending. It should be safe when suspending just regularly because it's just a noop. We might not even want "throwing a promise" in this mechanism to be supported longer term but for now that's how a suspend in internals. DiffTrain build for [c10010a](c10010a)
acdlite
added a commit
to acdlite/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2023
Includes the following upstream changes: - [aef7ce554](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/aef7ce554) [Flight] Progressively Enhanced Server Actions ([vercel#26774](facebook/react#26774)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [c10010a6a](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/c10010a6a) [Fizz] Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs ([vercel#26768](facebook/react#26768)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [f533cee8c](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/f533cee8c) Add useFormStatus to Flight fixture ([#26773](facebook/react#26773)) (Andrew Clark) - [2c1117a8d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/2c1117a8d) Reuse request so that a ReabableStream body does not become disturbed ([vercel#26771](facebook/react#26771)) (Andrew Gadzik) - [fa7a447b9](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/fa7a447b9) [Fizz] Check for nullish values on ReactCustomFormAction ([vercel#26770](facebook/react#26770)) (Sebastian Markbåge)
acdlite
added a commit
to vercel/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2023
Includes the following upstream changes: - [aef7ce554](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/aef7ce554) [Flight] Progressively Enhanced Server Actions ([#26774](facebook/react#26774)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [c10010a6a](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/c10010a6a) [Fizz] Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs ([#26768](facebook/react#26768)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [f533cee8c](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/f533cee8c) Add useFormStatus to Flight fixture ([#26773](facebook/react#26773)) (Andrew Clark) - [2c1117a8d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/2c1117a8d) Reuse request so that a ReabableStream body does not become disturbed ([#26771](facebook/react#26771)) (Andrew Gadzik) - [fa7a447b9](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/fa7a447b9) [Fizz] Check for nullish values on ReactCustomFormAction ([#26770](facebook/react#26770)) (Sebastian Markbåge) <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation or adding/fixing Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # -->
sebmarkbage
pushed a commit
to sebmarkbage/next.js
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2023
Includes the following upstream changes: - [aef7ce554](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/aef7ce554) [Flight] Progressively Enhanced Server Actions ([vercel#26774](facebook/react#26774)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [c10010a6a](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/c10010a6a) [Fizz] Gracefully handle suspending in DOM configs ([vercel#26768](facebook/react#26768)) (Sebastian Markbåge) - [f533cee8c](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/f533cee8c) Add useFormStatus to Flight fixture ([#26773](facebook/react#26773)) (Andrew Clark) - [2c1117a8d](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/2c1117a8d) Reuse request so that a ReabableStream body does not become disturbed ([vercel#26771](facebook/react#26771)) (Andrew Gadzik) - [fa7a447b9](https://github.com/facebook/react/commits/fa7a447b9) [Fizz] Check for nullish values on ReactCustomFormAction ([vercel#26770](facebook/react#26770)) (Sebastian Markbåge)
EdisonVan
pushed a commit
to EdisonVan/react
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
E.g. if we suspend (throw a promise) in pushStartInstance today we might have already pushed some chunks (or even child segments potentially). We should revert back to where we were. This doesn't usually happen because when we suspend in a component it doesn't write anything itself, it'll always defer to som host instance to do the writing. There was a todo about this already but I'm not 100% sure it's always safe when suspending. It should be safe when suspending just regularly because it's just a noop. We might not even want "throwing a promise" in this mechanism to be supported longer term but for now that's how a suspend in internals.
bigfootjon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
E.g. if we suspend (throw a promise) in pushStartInstance today we might have already pushed some chunks (or even child segments potentially). We should revert back to where we were. This doesn't usually happen because when we suspend in a component it doesn't write anything itself, it'll always defer to som host instance to do the writing. There was a todo about this already but I'm not 100% sure it's always safe when suspending. It should be safe when suspending just regularly because it's just a noop. We might not even want "throwing a promise" in this mechanism to be supported longer term but for now that's how a suspend in internals. DiffTrain build for commit c10010a.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
E.g. if we suspend (throw a promise) in pushStartInstance today we might have already pushed some chunks (or even child segments potentially). We should revert back to where we were.
This doesn't usually happen because when we suspend in a component it doesn't write anything itself, it'll always defer to som host instance to do the writing.
There was a todo about this already but I'm not 100% sure it's always safe when suspending. It should be safe when suspending just regularly because it's just a noop. We might not even want "throwing a promise" in this mechanism to be supported longer term but for now that's how a suspend in internals.