-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(@jest/globals): add missing options
argument to jest.doMock
typing
#12292
Conversation
|
||
expectError(jest.doMock('moduleName', jest.fn(), {})); | ||
expectError(jest.doMock('moduleName', jest.fn(), {virtual: true})); | ||
expectType<typeof jest>(jest.doMock('moduleName', jest.fn(), {})); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Strange to allow empty object, but jest.mock
is typed exactly the same.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks!
options
argument to jest.doMock
typingoptions
argument to jest.doMock
typing
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Fixes #12289
Summary
As it was noted in the issue,
jest.doMock
typing is missingoptions
argument. Easy to fix.Test plan
Type test is updated.