-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 0.9.0 #1430
Comments
Yea, the plan is to move the more complex issues until 0.10. |
Is there an estimate on the release of 0.9.0? My team is using flow extensively and the tests integration would be very helpful for us. |
We'll delay Flow integration until 0.10 alpha which would be out very soon after 0.9.0. I'm busy with React right now but I know @Timer offered help cutting 0.9.0. So I'm happy to take him up on that offer :-) There's a few things we need to discuss regarding it, happy to do it here or in a separate issue. |
Thank you for the answer! |
You can do this @Timer! By the way, is there a way to use my fork or a commit of |
This? |
Like that, but I guess I should either publish my form on npm or provide a |
Sorry, I don't have a better solution—we're hitting the limits of what npm can do. |
No problem; I guess the main problem is that the npm package and the repo don't mean the same thing. One reason is the monorepo setup; there isn't a one-to-one relationship with the repo and generated npm packages. Another other reason would be prepublish hooks, but as far as I can see react-scripts doesn't use it. Maybe creating a multi-repo fork would work for me, but I don't see how I could keep it synchronized. I previously suggested having a |
Let's try to cut it today! I'll be working on this shortly -- anyone's review would be appreciated:
|
Hey guys, sorry to disappoint but I don't think it's going to happen today. Build exit codes and PUBLIC_URL support have some pending changes, and |
0.9.0 has been released. Please let me know if you encounter any bugs. |
Nice work @Timer! |
Thank you, @existentialism! |
Works like a charm, thanks @Timer! |
That's reassuring! Thanks @frontsideair. |
Can we have a release before
0.9.0
? #1309 is pretty important to me but I see there are a lot of issues within the0.9.0
tag. Or can we postpone them after0.9.0
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: