We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trouble building with MSVC was reported in #664 , and the cause seems to be a gratuituous constructor of "poor man's optional":
poor_mans_optional &operator=(const T &&value) noexcept(::std::is_nothrow_move_assignable<T>::value)
I'm not quite sure why I introduced this in the first place, given that we already have a
poor_mans_optional &operator=(T &&value) noexcept(::std::is_nothrow_move_assignable<T>::value)
... so let's just remove this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixes #666, regards #664: Removing a seemingly-redundant constructor …
f69368b
…of `poor_mans_optional<T>` from `const T&&`
No branches or pull requests
Trouble building with MSVC was reported in #664 , and the cause seems to be a gratuituous constructor of "poor man's optional":
I'm not quite sure why I introduced this in the first place, given that we already have a
... so let's just remove this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: