Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

version mismatch with wrenc? #124

Open
colinleach opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

version mismatch with wrenc? #124

colinleach opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@colinleach
Copy link

Your instructions for installing wren locally on Linux (https://exercism.org/docs/tracks/wren/installation) are for wrenc v0.2.90 (wren v0.4.0). This installed successfully and I could run wrenc to get a console prompt, but package installation failed. Running wrenc package.wren install gave the error "Could not load module 'wren-package'." and I got a similar error from the wren console prompt.

The repo https://github.com/joshgoebel/wren-console/releases currrently gives v0.3.1 (dated Nov 2021), and this seems to have none of the same problems: at least with hello-world, I haven't got further yet. I'm not sure of the best way to respond - maybe update the installation instructions to v0.3??

Thanks for providing this resource, I now look forward to learning the language.

@github-actions
Copy link

Hello. Thanks for opening an issue on Exercism. We are currently in a phase of our journey where we have paused community contributions to allow us to take a breather and redesign our community model. You can learn more in this blog post. As such, all issues and PRs in this repository are being automatically closed.

That doesn't mean we're not interested in your ideas, or that if you're stuck on something we don't want to help. The best place to discuss things is with our community on the Exercism Community Forum. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic there.


Note: If this issue has been pre-approved, please link back to this issue on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it.

@joshgoebel joshgoebel reopened this Jan 12, 2023
@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

Exactly. I think I completed the docs before everything was good and ready. I'll get the version numbers updated soon. Thanks.

@joshgoebel joshgoebel self-assigned this Jan 12, 2023
@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

@colinleach Check #125

@colinleach
Copy link
Author

I'm a bit confused by the github workflow, but the changes look good - thank you!

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

joshgoebel commented Jan 13, 2023

I think: new version of libc incompatible with Wren 0.4.0 (IIRC from memory of issues)... it needs a small patch, but that's not going to matter for just a docfix.

@colinleach
Copy link
Author

libc is far beyond my expertise (sorry - I'm a retired organic chemist, not an IT professional). What I will say is that I came to Wren via the 12in23 challenge and I very much hope others will too. It would be a pity to repel them at Hello World: your language deserves more respect.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

Not my language. I only helped build out the track and tooling. But yes, Wren is awesome.

@joshgoebel
Copy link
Contributor

The docs say 3.1 now... can this be closed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants