-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECIP-1001: ECIP Code of Conduct #239
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ | ||
--- | ||
lang: en | ||
ecip: 1001 | ||
title: ECIP Code of Conduct | ||
status: Draft | ||
type: Meta | ||
discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereumclassic/ECIPs/issues/238 | ||
author: Yaz Khoury (@YazzyYaz) | ||
created: 2019-12-03 | ||
license: CC-By-4.0 License | ||
--- | ||
This Code of Conduct ECIP has been taken directly from [Contributor Covenant Open Source Code of Conduct](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/) | ||
under the [CC-By-4.0 License](https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/blob/release/LICENSE.md) | ||
|
||
This Code of Conduct ECIP applies to all members wishing to participate in the ECIP process: | ||
1) ECIP Editors | ||
2) ECIP Coordinators | ||
3) Hardfork Coordinators | ||
4) ECIP Authors | ||
5) Ethereum Classic Community Members Participating in the ECIP Process. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Our Pledge | ||
We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. | ||
|
||
We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, diverse, inclusive, and healthy community. | ||
|
||
## Our Standards | ||
Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our community include: | ||
|
||
* Demonstrating empathy and kindness toward other people | ||
* Being respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences | ||
* Giving and gracefully accepting constructive feedback | ||
* Accepting responsibility and apologizing to those affected by our mistakes, and learning from the experience | ||
* Focusing on what is best not just for us as individuals, but for the overall community | ||
|
||
Examples of unacceptable behavior include: | ||
|
||
* The use of sexualized language or imagery, and sexual attention or advances of any kind | ||
* Trolling, insulting or derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks | ||
YazzyYaz marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
* Public or private harassment | ||
* Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or email address, or real names, without their explicit permission | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. IMO this should be the only thing on this list There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's fair. What about harassment? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Playing the devil's advocate here: That won't be covered by doxing but should be covered by harassment. I think trolling is fine if its just for shit and giggles. Personal attacks I'm not sure about since they can be very subjective. Say we remove them then until we have a better definition. Political attacks I feel have been going on for a while in the community (calling someone a communist or a stupid liberal, etc.) I just don't know what one should do in this case. We can remove it until we also have a better definition of it. We should be able to leave room for dissent and instigation since it's what keeps our process honest. Maybe you can provide a draft for something you have in mind in regards to that? |
||
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting | ||
|
||
## Enforcement Responsibilities | ||
Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful. | ||
|
||
Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation decisions when appropriate. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. the only case i'd argue seems acceptable to delete something on behalf of someone else is in the event of dox There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They should communicate all decisions regardless of whether they think it's appropriate or not, Giving "community leaders" the ability to enforce / decide what content is/isn't acceptable and then not holding them accountable for their actions is giving a select few an abnormally high level of power over the project. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @BelfordZ agreed that doxing is the main reason for this doc. We certainly want to allow for instigation and dissent in our community. But I worry there are things worse than doxing too that we might leave out. |
||
|
||
## Scope | ||
This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces. Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. | ||
|
||
## Enforcement | ||
Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at [INSERT CONTACT METHOD]. All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly. | ||
|
||
All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the reporter of any incident. | ||
|
||
## Enforcement Guidelines | ||
Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct: | ||
|
||
1. Correction | ||
Community Impact: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed unprofessional or unwelcome in the community. | ||
|
||
Consequence: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested. | ||
|
||
2. Warning | ||
Community Impact: A violation through a single incident or series of actions. | ||
|
||
Consequence: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or permanent ban. | ||
|
||
3. Temporary Ban | ||
Community Impact: A serious violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior. | ||
|
||
Consequence: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period. Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban. | ||
|
||
4. Permanent Ban | ||
Community Impact: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals. | ||
|
||
Consequence: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within the project community. | ||
|
||
Attribution | ||
This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, version 2.0, available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html. | ||
|
||
Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by Mozilla’s code of conduct enforcement ladder. | ||
|
||
For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So i have to remove all my pron from the blockchain?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're confusing sexuality with gender
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the flip side, we can rectify this to say you shouldn't discriminate someone's ECIP based on their sexuality or gender or make them feel uncomfortable to submit an ECIP