Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ECIP-1092 #357

Closed
slavserver opened this issue Aug 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

ECIP-1092 #357

slavserver opened this issue Aug 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
editor:3 duplicate This contribution is a duplicate.

Comments

@slavserver
Copy link

Are you seriously? Now, in no case should the algorithm be changed, ECIP-1092 only (PirlGuard)! I hope you understand why this should not be done .. In the future, it is necessary to monitor ECIP-1092, I'm sure everything will be fine, and only then, gradually, you can think about changing the algorithm, at least in a year. And I am 90% sure that there will be no need to change the algorithm.
@ponchoetc
Copy link

agree LET ETC AWAY FROM ASIC miners dont want to lick chinese asic factory balls

@q9f
Copy link
Contributor

q9f commented Aug 31, 2020

duplicate of #327

@q9f q9f closed this as completed Aug 31, 2020
@q9f q9f added the editor:0 invalid This contribution has major issues. label Aug 31, 2020
@q9f q9f added editor:3 duplicate This contribution is a duplicate. and removed editor:0 invalid This contribution has major issues. labels Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editor:3 duplicate This contribution is a duplicate.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@slavserver @q9f @ponchoetc