Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Moving Travis checks to Azure Pipelines #3034

Closed
nivida opened this issue Aug 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Moving Travis checks to Azure Pipelines #3034

nivida opened this issue Aug 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
1.x 1.0 related issues 2.x 2.0 related issues Discussion Enhancement Includes improvements or optimizations

Comments

@nivida
Copy link
Contributor

nivida commented Aug 16, 2019

Description

Example from Embark:
https://github.com/embark-framework/embark/blob/master/azure-pipelines.yml
@nivida nivida added Enhancement Includes improvements or optimizations Discussion 1.x 1.0 related issues 2.x 2.0 related issues labels Aug 16, 2019
@michaelsbradleyjr
Copy link
Contributor

michaelsbradleyjr commented Aug 16, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Per the linked example of an azure-pipelines.yml, there is support for running Linux, macOS, and Windows builds across multiple versions of Node.js, which makes AzP pretty attractive. The free tier for open source projects has been serving the Embark Framework well for many months now.

See: https://dev.azure.com/embark-framework/Embark/_build?definitionId=1

@cgewecke cgewecke mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2019
Closed
9 tasks
@ukstv
Copy link

ukstv commented Nov 8, 2019

Why, if you could have it here on GitHub via GitHub Actions? Also, it is quite similar in syntax to Azure DevOps.

@nivida nivida mentioned this issue Feb 2, 2020
Closed
@nivida nivida mentioned this issue Feb 28, 2020
Closed
@holgerd77
Copy link
Collaborator

Will close in favor of #3393

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1.x 1.0 related issues 2.x 2.0 related issues Discussion Enhancement Includes improvements or optimizations
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@ukstv @michaelsbradleyjr @holgerd77 @nivida