Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(github): Coverage script on remote repo #657

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

winsvega
Copy link
Collaborator

@winsvega winsvega commented Jun 30, 2024

πŸ—’οΈ Description

this should fix coverge script on prs coming from remote repos

πŸ”— Related Issues

#647

βœ… Checklist

  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes.
  • All: Considered squashing commits to improve commit history.
  • All: Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
  • Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been added to converted-ethereum-tests.txt.
  • Tests: A PR with removal of converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been opened.
  • Tests: Included the type and version of evm t8n tool used to locally execute test cases: e.g., ref with commit hash or geth 1.13.1-stable-3f40e65.
  • Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.

@winsvega winsvega added the type:test Type: Test label Jun 30, 2024
@marioevz marioevz changed the title fix coverage script on remote repo fix(github): Coverage script on remote repo Jul 2, 2024
Copy link
Member

@marioevz marioevz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@marioevz marioevz merged commit 839b46f into main Jul 2, 2024
7 checks passed
@marioevz marioevz deleted the fix_coverage_remote branch July 2, 2024 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:test Type: Test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants