-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 285
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Precompiles: gas analysis and execution via stub #524
Conversation
8a39517
to
2a5e48c
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #524 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 98.08% 97.37% -0.71%
==========================================
Files 60 61 +1
Lines 5837 5825 -12
==========================================
- Hits 5725 5672 -53
- Misses 112 153 +41
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
022dc89
to
e38045f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used keccak hash for inputs and performance is similar.
242db76
to
3fce7ed
Compare
3fce7ed
to
0f43598
Compare
sha256 = 0x02, | ||
ripemd160 = 0x03, | ||
identity = 0x04, | ||
expmod = 0x05, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why expmod and not modexp? Yellowpaper? I know clients disagree on the naming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IDK, maybe because addmod and mulmod.
No description provided.