Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

specs: clarify system config changes #8829

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

tynes
Copy link
Contributor

@tynes tynes commented Jan 4, 2024

Description

Updates the specs to cover the system config interactions with the ecotone hardfork

@tynes tynes requested review from a team as code owners January 4, 2024 05:41
@tynes tynes requested review from maurelian and Inphi and removed request for a team January 4, 2024 05:41
Base automatically changed from eclipse-specs to develop January 5, 2024 00:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes are related to the Ecotone hardfork in a blockchain system. The hardfork involves updating system functions and configuration parameters. Specifically, a function has been renamed to reflect its post-hardfork version, and the system configuration documentation now includes an "Ecotone Activation" section with details on the transition and new constants for the hardfork. Additionally, there are updates on how to handle configuration events for Ecotone-specific fee parameters.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
specs/derivation.md Modified function calls, replaced setL1BlockValues with setL1BlockValuesEcotone, and added documentation related to the Ecotone hardfork activation.
specs/system_config.md Added "Ecotone Activation" section, specified constants and rules for the hardfork activation block, and outlined handling of ConfigUpdate events related to Ecotone fee parameters.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

specs/system_config.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@Inphi Inphi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

specs/system_config.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
specs/system_config.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

semgrep-app bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Semgrep found 10 sol-style-return-arg-fmt findings:

Named return arguments to functions must be appended with an underscore (_)

Ignore this finding from sol-style-return-arg-fmt.

Semgrep found 40 sol-style-notice-over-dev-natspec findings:

Prefer @notice over @dev in natspec comments

Ignore this finding from sol-style-notice-over-dev-natspec.

Semgrep found 1 todos_require_linear finding:

  • op-node/rollup/derive/engine_queue.go: L692

Please create a GitHub ticket for this TODO.

Ignore this finding from todos_require_linear.

@tynes tynes force-pushed the eclipse-specs-sys-config branch from e20ea91 to a485db4 Compare January 10, 2024 23:23
@tynes tynes force-pushed the eclipse-specs-sys-config branch from a485db4 to fcb57bd Compare January 12, 2024 00:14
@tynes tynes enabled auto-merge January 12, 2024 00:15
@tynes tynes added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 12, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 12, 2024
@trianglesphere trianglesphere added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 13, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 13, 2024
@mslipper
Copy link
Collaborator

We have opted for a different solution that obviates the need for the system config to be modified as part of Ecotone. Closing this PR.

@mslipper mslipper closed this Jan 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants