SuperchainERC20: Spike xERC20 over New Standard

[tynes]

This ticket involves spiking out what an xERC20 based superchain erc20 standard would like like compared to the one proposed in ethereum-optimism/specs#71. The learnings of this spike should be used to drive updates to the spec. We need to update the spec including the specific reasons behind the decision to go with one standard over the other.

[0xParticle]

@tynes we think this task is outdated and should be deprecated. How should we handle it?

[skeletor-spaceman]

closing this issue, since we already went with the superc20 vanilla design, while keeping SuperOPxERC20 as a custom implementation.

[stas]

@skeletor-spaceman where's the best place to follow the work on SuperOPxERC20?

[skeletor-spaceman]

hey @stas ! I just created the parent ticket for the SuperOPxERC20 standard :)
You'll be able to follow progress there: #11485
First we need the Custom Implementation Factory, to then create the xERC20 flavor on top :)

[stas]

Ty ty! Excited!!!