Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lol #4

Closed
slavserver opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

lol #4

slavserver opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@slavserver
Copy link

slavserver commented Nov 18, 2020

hello ... remember ubiqhash and how it fell in price ... you would like only video cards to be mining ... and what, your coin went to the bottom ...
Now imagine, you are doing etchash, you are planning to attract 3 gigabytes, 4 gigabytes of video cards to mining .... and what's the point? these video cards, compared to modern ones, consume more electricity ... a modern 8 gigabyte card consumes 70 watts .... while older cards consume 150-180 watts of energy ... you as ubiqhash destroy the coin .... you were asked - pirlguard


привет... вспомните ubiqhash икак он упал в цене..... вы, хотели, что бы майнингом занимались только видеокарты..... и что, ваша монета ушла на дно....
а теперь представьтье, вы делаете etchash , вы планируте привлечь к майнингу видеокарты 3 гигабата, 4 гигабайта.... а в чем смысл? эти видео карты, по сравнению с современныменными, потребляют больше электричичесва..... современная карта на 8 гигабайт, потребляет 70 ватт.... в то время как более древние карты потребляют 150- 180 ватт энергиии.... вы, как ubiqhash уничтожите монету.... вам было предложено - pirlguard

@nenastupi
Copy link

+1
against algorithm change

@meowsbits
Copy link
Member

For discussion on ECIP1099, please use ethereumclassic/ECIPs#368.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants