Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark #96

Open
Imperatorn opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Benchmark #96

Imperatorn opened this issue Nov 6, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Imperatorn
Copy link

Hi, nice library!

Have you done any benchmarks of it?

Thanks

@etcimon
Copy link
Owner

etcimon commented Nov 6, 2023

Hello,

Yes, it's a little slower than openssl on private keys due to better optimized montgomery operations, for servers it would be faster when linking with openssl (use the build variation). Otherwise, I haven't noticed nor benchmarked it

Thanks

@etcimon
Copy link
Owner

etcimon commented Nov 6, 2023

Sorry, I thought you were commenting on another library. I've never benchmarked this library unfortunately, but it's very barebone so I assume it would be quite fast. I was using it in production with https://github.com/etcimon/vibe.0

@etcimon
Copy link
Owner

etcimon commented Nov 6, 2023

Someone contributed a benchmark if you'd like to compare req/s on your own machine

https://github.com/etcimon/libasync/tree/master/tests/http_request_benchmark

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants