Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running epicli init -p any --full generates cloud sample configuration instead of bare metal config #736

Closed
erzetpe opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@erzetpe
Copy link
Contributor

erzetpe commented Nov 19, 2019

No description provided.

@seriva seriva self-assigned this Feb 26, 2020
@seriva seriva added the size/XS label Feb 26, 2020
seriva added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
Fixed addition of infrastructure documents when using --ful flag (#940)
Switched from PyYAML to ruamel.yaml to preserve comments and commented out configs in the defaults. (#611)
Fixed running epicli init -p any --full generating cloud sample configuration (#736)
Checked if additional security rules for NSGs are applied properly for Azure (#942)
Exclusion of SET_BY_AUTOMATION fields on generated configs
Updated gen-licenses.py to use requirements.txt to generate licenses.py file instead of PipEnv
@seriva seriva closed this as completed Feb 26, 2020
to-bar pushed a commit to to-bar/epiphany that referenced this issue May 6, 2020
Fixed addition of infrastructure documents when using --ful flag (hitachienergy#940)
Switched from PyYAML to ruamel.yaml to preserve comments and commented out configs in the defaults. (hitachienergy#611)
Fixed running epicli init -p any --full generating cloud sample configuration (hitachienergy#736)
Checked if additional security rules for NSGs are applied properly for Azure (hitachienergy#942)
Exclusion of SET_BY_AUTOMATION fields on generated configs
Updated gen-licenses.py to use requirements.txt to generate licenses.py file instead of PipEnv
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants